<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The perfect size for a Flash game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/</link>
	<description>italian geek and PROgrammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: malu</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-893990</link>
		<dc:creator>malu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-893990</guid>
		<description>nadav, for digital applications, you should use 72 dpi photoshop templates
hope it helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nadav, for digital applications, you should use 72 dpi photoshop templates<br />
hope it helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadav</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-774828</link>
		<dc:creator>nadav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-774828</guid>
		<description>hi guys, 
the frame size is fine, lets say 640*480. but what DPI do i set if i want to build the stage in photoshop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi guys,<br />
the frame size is fine, lets say 640*480. but what DPI do i set if i want to build the stage in photoshop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-766588</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 05:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-766588</guid>
		<description>640 x 400 fits the golden ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>640 x 400 fits the golden ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-757496</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-757496</guid>
		<description>Haha! That&#039;s the standard DV NTSC resolution for video! Why not just go HD 1080p? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! That&#8217;s the standard DV NTSC resolution for video! Why not just go HD 1080p? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jumpkut</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-751562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jumpkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-751562</guid>
		<description>I like to use 720x480.
It just seems appealing to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to use 720&#215;480.<br />
It just seems appealing to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resolutie van een Flashgame &#171; Indie game design</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-555485</link>
		<dc:creator>Resolutie van een Flashgame &#171; Indie game design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-555485</guid>
		<description>[...] mijn research naar resoluties van Flashgames stuitte ik op deze blogpost van de Italiaanse Flashprogrammeur Emanuele Feronato. Hij presenteert een aantal statistieken over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mijn research naar resoluties van Flashgames stuitte ik op deze blogpost van de Italiaanse Flashprogrammeur Emanuele Feronato. Hij presenteert een aantal statistieken over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minie</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-552388</link>
		<dc:creator>Minie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-552388</guid>
		<description>I am making a dress up game.It has quite a lot of parts so 1024x748 works best for me since all images are photoshop imported and have their own dimensions and resolution...I could go smaller but not too much.
I have trouble when testing flash movie because it only shows part of a whole thing, like 1/4. I can expand it a little with window expanding but not nearly enough.
What to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am making a dress up game.It has quite a lot of parts so 1024&#215;748 works best for me since all images are photoshop imported and have their own dimensions and resolution&#8230;I could go smaller but not too much.<br />
I have trouble when testing flash movie because it only shows part of a whole thing, like 1/4. I can expand it a little with window expanding but not nearly enough.<br />
What to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arby</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-536273</link>
		<dc:creator>Arby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-536273</guid>
		<description>Ezion: Yes. Bigger dimensions = slow rendering for the Flash player. However, if you code in AS3, this is less of an issue.

550x400 is most popular eh? That&#039;s the default stage size in Flash. Haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ezion: Yes. Bigger dimensions = slow rendering for the Flash player. However, if you code in AS3, this is less of an issue.</p>
<p>550&#215;400 is most popular eh? That&#8217;s the default stage size in Flash. Haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ezion</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-438868</link>
		<dc:creator>Ezion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-438868</guid>
		<description>I was looking for common resolutions a couple weeks ago when deciding the resolution for a new project. In the end, I settled for 480x600 because it fit best with the type of game and seemed to be a somewhat common resolution. Looks like I might&#039;ve had that backwards, though.

A question about resolution; does processing required for a flash movie go up linearly or exponentially as you go up in pixels? An 800x600 flash seems like it would be very intensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking for common resolutions a couple weeks ago when deciding the resolution for a new project. In the end, I settled for 480&#215;600 because it fit best with the type of game and seemed to be a somewhat common resolution. Looks like I might&#8217;ve had that backwards, though.</p>
<p>A question about resolution; does processing required for a flash movie go up linearly or exponentially as you go up in pixels? An 800&#215;600 flash seems like it would be very intensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrozenHaddock</title>
		<link>http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/04/20/the-perfect-size-for-a-flash-game/#comment-438562</link>
		<dc:creator>FrozenHaddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emanueleferonato.com/?p=1160#comment-438562</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a fan of 500x400, 400x400, 400x300, 300x300 and of course the lovely, lazy 550x400.

Of course, the stage size is something to expermient with. A smaller stage size leaves less blankspace you&#039;d otherwise have to fill. Less clutter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a fan of 500&#215;400, 400&#215;400, 400&#215;300, 300&#215;300 and of course the lovely, lazy 550&#215;400.</p>
<p>Of course, the stage size is something to expermient with. A smaller stage size leaves less blankspace you&#8217;d otherwise have to fill. Less clutter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/11 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.emanueleferonato.com @ 2012-02-11 04:49:59 -->
